
Two articles, one each from Wash Post and NYT follow. Both focus on finance as it relates to national security. IMHO, both are probably more true than not. Also IMHO, the two parties principally responsible are Donald Rumsfeld and L. Paul Bremer. Had those two, particularly Rumsfeld, not filled the Coalition Provisional Authority with ideologues, particularly Bremer, certain key actions like de-Baathification and dissolution of Iraqi institutions might have not been taken and Iraq might have come in at far lower cost. I think Friedman (NYT, second article) is spot-on with respect to effect. We have been down that road before. As high intensity military operations wind down, the public guns/butter debate inevitably shifts to butter and the nation disarms. It happened after WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and DESERT SHIELD/STORM. I predict that it will happen again and that we will have another Task Force SMITH incident where vital or survival national interests compel us to rush inadequately trained, structured, and resourced forces to some emergent conflict where they will get needlessly slaughtered.)
Washington Post September 5, 2010 Pg. B4 By Joseph E. Stiglitz and Linda J. Bilmes
A War More Costly Than We Thought
New York Times September 5, 2010 Pg. WK8 By Thomas L. Friedman
Superbroke, Superfrugal, Superpower?
Below the line is a strong comment sent to the Contributing Editor of this post.




