
Syria claims sarin seizure at rebel hideout as Russia ‘blocks’ UN’s Qusair resolution
If the Syrian Dictator Must Go… Why Not the Dictators in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain?

by Jon Rappoport
June 3, 2013
Researchers, pundits, and academics look for metaphors to describe the mind. For at least 50 years, the favorite analogy has been the computer.
“Well, both the mind and a computer employ logic. They store data. They use strategies to solve problems.”
Is that it? The mind is merely a problem-solving machine? Of course not.
That’s where the metaphor breaks down.
By the way, a metaphor is way of describing one thing in terms of another. It’s not literal. People used to learn that in school.
Two days ago, I wrote and posted an article headlined: “150 million Americans go to Mexico, swim back, become instant millionaires.” Some people apparently thought I was reporting a fact. Or misreporting it.
It’s called satire. That’s when you take a metaphor and stretch it beyond the breaking point of exaggeration. In that case, I was commenting on current immigration/welfare policy.
Metaphor isn’t fact.
The metaphor of “mind as computer” isn’t a fact, no matter how hard technocrats wish it were true.
Behind the moronic and childish presumptions of technocracy, there are indeed people who want to treat the mind as a computer for a very simple reason: they want to control it.
Continue reading “Jon Rappoport: Your Mind is Not a Computer”

Heard in the jungle….
Is it Time for a New World Order?
The Old World Order is Based on
1) Oil
2) Aviation
3) Banks that Steal Money from it's Customers
3) Religion that is based on Lies
4) The Occult Dictatorship of the 1% over the 99%
5) Politicians that are not responsible of their actions and act like Puppets for the Evil Cabal
6) Stock Markets that are Manipulated on a Daily Basis by the chosen People.
7) Slavery and Depression
The New World Order should be based on
1) Water as the only Source of Energy
2) A Global Network of Zero Emission Hypersonic Trains
3) Bankers that are castrated
4) The 1% taken all their Money and Land and give it to the 99% with the emphasis on overproduction of Food and cleaning up this Planet
5) Politicians that pay with all their belongings and even with their Life if they lead us into Wars that are unjustified
6) Closing of all Stock Markets as they are only there to Manipulate the Masses
7) Individual Rights, Right of self Rule and Freedom.
The New World Order is coming, make no mistake.
But right now we can shape it the way we want/
How it will look like is up to us.
Oppose any Dictatorship I say!

Every dying Empire has its truth telling prophet and America had its own with Chalmers Johnson. Johnson correctly compared the decay of the American empire, with its well over 600 overseas military bases, with the fall of the Roman Empire whereas the Senate becomes a wealthy corporate club and irrelevant compared to the ruling Military Industrial Congressional Complex
Chalmers Johnson was a truth teller and prophet in a political environment where few would stand up to the interests and secrecy of the Pentagon and the intelligence community ~ and since his passing in November of 2010, many of his prophetic fears have been realized in the Obama administration.
Johnson, author of Blowback, Sorrows of Empire and Nemesis,The Last Days of the American Republic, talks in this video interview about the similarities in the decline of the Roman and Soviet empires and the signs that the U.S. empire is exhibiting the very same symptoms ~ overextension, corruption and the inability to reform. (Watch at least the first 20 minutes and also the very end where he predicts an economic collapse)
Johnson’ s main points were; The United States is treading the same three steps as the former Soviet Union;
Continue reading “Allen Roland: Honoring Chalmers Johnson, Prophet of Truth + Empire Meta-RECAP”

I strongly agree with [former US CIA Director] R. James Woolsey and [a former CIA analyst and Executive Director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security, an Advisory Board to Congress] Dr. Peter Vincent Pry that the electromagnetic pulse (EMP) threat to the U.S. demands our strongest attention (“How North Korea Could Cripple the U.S.,” op-ed, May 21).

Could anything have checked America’s mad rush to war in Iraq in 2003, driven as it was by a cabal of neoconmen intent on cynically manipulating the trauma of 9-11 to achieve a different agenda?
Perhaps (1) if Colin Powell had the courage to resign on principle rather than allowing himself to be pressured into giving his disgraceful imitation of Adlai Stevenson's performance at the UN during the Cuban Missile Crisis, or almost certainly (2) if the UK Prime Minister Tony Blair sided with France, Germany, and Russia and the majority of Europeans in opposing the Iraq war. Of course, no one will ever know, but Powell enjoyed immense moral stature at the time, and without his cheerleading, the veneer of Bush’s and Cheney’s moral authority would certainly have been far weaker. The case of Blair, aka Bush’s poodle, is more complex: If the UK sided with Europe, Bush would have been isolated and the march to war very likely might well have been still born.
But a large number, perhaps a majority, of the English people do not see themselves as being Europeans. And the English elites, like Blair, trust instead in using the UK’s “special relationship” with the US to punch above their weight in world affairs. Viewed narrowly, the UK-US special relationship has roots in WWII, but the UK’s proud sense of separateness from Europe reaches back at least a 1000 years in history and is grounded in its island geography. The English have never resolved the question: Are they part of Europe? The UK’s tepid membership in the EU illustrates the point.
The below op-ed by Immanuel Wallerstein argues that European question is again coming to forefront of British politics and pressure to leave the EU is mounting. Moreover, the question is being complicated by the growing regional tensions in Northern Ireland, Wales, and especially Scotland.
Continue reading “Chuck Spinney: Whither the British Poodle?”
Globalization Creates a New Worry: Enemy Convergence
By THOM SHANKER
New York Times, 30 May 2013
WASHINGTON — Adm. James G. Stavridis, who stepped down this month as NATO’s supreme commander, has been at war in two wars — overseeing the alliance’s role in the enduring mission in Afghanistan as well as the shorter combat air campaign over Libya.
Combined with his tenure before NATO — he was the top officer at the military’s Southern Command, for a total of seven years in a senior four-star billet — Admiral Stavridis had been the longest-serving global combatant commander in the American military.
As he rose through the ranks of command over a 37-year career in uniform, Admiral Stavridis also came to be recognized as one of the military’s most prolific authors on strategy, operations and tactics. Today, though, ask what worries him most, and he answers in a single word: convergence.
Continue reading “Berto Jongman: Admrial James Stavrides Expands on “Open Source Security””