Journal: Food Addiction–Could It Explain Why 70 Percent of Americans Are F

01 Agriculture, 03 Economy, 06 Family, 07 Health, 07 Other Atrocities, 11 Society, Analysis, Civil Society, Commerce, Corporations, Government, Misinformation & Propaganda, Money, Banks & Concentrated Wealth
Mark Hyman, MD

Mark Hyman, MD

Practicing physician

Posted: October 16, 2010 09:04 AM

Food Addiction: Could It Explain Why 70 Percent of Americans Are Fat?

Our government and food industry both encourage more “personal responsibility” when it comes to battling the obesity epidemic and its associated diseases. They say people should exercise more self-control, make better choices, avoid overeating, and reduce their intake of sugar-sweetened drinks and processed food. We are led to believe that there is no good food or bad food, that it's all a matter of balance. This sounds good in theory, except for one thing…

New discoveries in science prove that industrially processed, sugar-, fat- and salt-laden food — food that is made in a plant rather than grown on a plant, as Michael Pollan would say — is biologically addictive.

Read entire story…

Phi Beta Iota: This is a HUGE story that merits more emphasis at The Huffington Post.  It is a perfect example of a newly-discovered “true cost” of the industrialization of agriculture which IS a contradiction in terms.  It is a perfect example of government complacency, ignorance, and ultimately irresponsibility.  This is precisely what public intelligence in the public interest is about.

See Also:

Worth a Look: Book Reviews on Corporate & Transnational Crime

Worth a Look: Book Reviews on Corporate Lack of Integrity or Intelligence or Both

Worth a Look: Book Reviews on Elite Rule

Worth a Look: Book Reviews on Middle Class

Worth a Look: Book Reviews on Poisons, Toxicity, Trash, & True Cost

Worth a Look: Book Reviews on Poverty

Journal: Green Supply Chain Management Requires Less Procrastination & More Innovation, Leading by Example

01 Agriculture, 03 Economy, 05 Energy, 07 Health
Dave Meyer's Green Supply Blog

EXTRACT:

The article, “Supply Chain Management and Sustainability: Procrastinating Integration in Mainstream Research” presents the results of a study conducted by several university researchers in The Netherlands. The researchers noted that “procrastination can be viewed as the result of several processes, determined not only by individual personality, but also by the following factors:

– availability of information;
– availability of opportunities and resources;
– skills and abilities;
– dependence on cooperation with others.”

In addition, in a review of more than 100 additional studies on procrastination, the following additional items were found to likely to influence procrastination:

– the nature of the task, and

– the context of the issue.

It is these last two issues that the authors raised as primary reasons for procrastination, especially regarding embedding sustainability research and practices in supply chain operations and management. The authors found that “the nature of the task”, because it’s often complex and requires many internal and external stakeholders, and therefore tends to “generate conflicts”.  Also, the roots of supply chain management and related research are generally grounded in operations management and operations/logistics.  Therefore, the researchers noted that environmental and social aspects of supply chain management are foreign,  “out of context” and not wholly integrated into supply chain management and research.  I would also argue that dependence on others is a key issue as well given the widespread, outward facing challenges associated with supply chain coordination.

Phi Beta Iota: Public Intelligence addresses this in two ways.  First, it harnesses cognitive surplus while also integrating education, intelligence, and research to MAKE the information available to BOTH the public and the enterprises in question.  Second, when the public sees an enterprise that is NOT making use of the information, the public begins to buycott (Jim Turner's term) that enterprise.  Public Intelligence is going to shape markets starting in 2012 and starting with Health.  See Summit '11.

Journal: CrowdSourcing Big Time–Games for Dollars

03 Economy, 11 Society, Collective Intelligence, Methods & Process

UPDATE of 16 October 2010: CrowdSourcing Conference Papers Online

Full Story Online

Is Microtask the Future of Work?

GigaOm By Liz Gannes Oct. 8, 2010

Crowdsourcing is often used for fairly menial tasks: correcting databases, screening offensive images, transcribing audio. But what if you could make those little bits of human labor even more menial, discrete and interchangeable? That’s what the Finnish company Microtask does. I met with Microtask CEO Wili Miettinen and CTO Otto Chrons earlier this week while they were in town for CrowdConf, the first major gathering for the crowdsourcing industry.

The World's First Conference on the Future of Distributed Work

Crowdsourcing is the act of engaging distributed groups of people to complete microtasks or generate information. It represents an expanding sphere of innovation, organization, data collection, and creativity.

Crowdsourcing raises complex questions about the future of work; the technical and organizational infrastructure used to complete large-scale tasks; and the relationships between computers, people, and the networks that connect us.

Conference happened on 4 October, visit conference site.

Phi Beta Iota: What we consider important about this is the clear profit incentive to integrate games and work.  This is huge.  It opens a number of almost infinitely scalable options that connect dots and people and money.

Journal: Time to ShitCan the FCC and Go Open Spectrum

03 Economy, 04 Education, 07 Other Atrocities, 09 Justice, 11 Society, Collective Intelligence, Commerce, Commercial Intelligence, Corruption, Government, Open Government, Politics of Science & Science of Politics, Power Behind-the-Scenes/Special Interests, Secrecy & Politics of Secrecy, Standards, Technologies, True Cost

DefDog Recommends...

November 30th, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) could
potentially engage in one of the largest federal power grabs we have ever
seen.

At the FCC’s November meeting – note the coincidental date of choice,
AFTER the impending election – three unelected bureaucrats (of five) could
simply vote themselves rulers of 1/6th of our entire economy – the
information and technology sector.

Meaning the Internet that you currently enjoy – that has been a marvel of
economic and information innovation and success – will be subject to vast
new governmental regulations.  You didn’t elect these people – but they
are on the verge of electing themselves Internet overlords.

November 30th Could Be the Day the Government Seizes Control of the Internet

by Seton Motley

November 30th, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) could potentially engage in one of the largest federal power grabs we have ever seen.

locked-computer

After two years of this Presidential Administration and this Congress, that is saying an awful lot about an awful lot.

And what’s worse, the FCC would be doing it without Congress weighing in.  At the FCC’s November meeting – note the coincidental date of choice, AFTER the impending election – three unelected bureaucrats (of five) could simply vote themselves rulers of 1/6th of our entire economy – the information and technology sector.

See Also:

Huffington Post Blogs on FCC & Internet

Search: seven tribes ninety nations coalition

Searches

Not yet but soon.  The Summit '11 will be the first step in realizing the eight tribes 90+ nation coalition, while here in the USA some amazing things are happening between the National Coalition for Deliberative Dialog (NCDD) and the Voter Choice Systems (VCS).

Right now, two different sets of human-in-the-loop answers.

Seven Tribes (now Eight, we split Media out from NGOs)

Search: smart nation intelligence reform electoral reform national security reform (umbrella link)

Search: Seven Tribes (now Eight Tribes)

2003 Information Peacekeeping & The Future of Intelligence: The United Nations, Smart Mobs, and the Seven Tribes

Graphic: The UN and the Eight Tribes of Intelligence

Graphic: Seven Tribes of Intelligence (Original)

Ninety Nations Coalition

Search: The Future of OSINT [is M4IS2-Multinational] (umbrella link)

Reference: M4IS2 OSINT UN NATO Search List Alpha

Search: Multinational Engagement (Intelligence)

Search: Strategic Analytic Model

2009 BRF DoD OSINT Leadership and Staff Briefings

2008 BRF DIA NDIC Multinational Intelligence Fellows

2007 DOC Memoranda: OSS CEO to DNI One-Pager

2006 BRF Briefing to the Coalition Coordination Center (CCC) Leadership at the U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM)–Multinational Intelligence: Can CENTCOM Lead the Way? Reflections on OSINT & the Coalition

2000-2002 HBK NATO OSINT Handbooks

See Also:

Reference: Virtual Cabinet at Huffington Post Updated

2004 BRF Department of State (March)

2005 DOC Memorandum: $2 Billion Obligation Plan Centered on Defense, for a New Open Source Agency

2002 DOC New Rules for the New Craft of Intelligence (Book 2 Chapter 15)

2002 BRF NSA in Las Vegas The New Craft of Intelligence: What Should the T Be Doing to the I in IT?

2005 DOC Memoranda: Creating a New Agency with a New Mission, New Methods, and a New Mind Set

Reference: Best Piece on Democracy in a Decade

Blog Wisdom, Civil Society, Collective Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence, Government, IO Sense-Making, Media Reports
Michael Ostrolenk Recommends

From Fire Dog Lake No Logo Available

Third Party Rising?

By: Nancy Bordier Friday October 15, 2010 2:25 pm

Eleven-Page 1997-2003 Paginated Word Document of Entire Piece

Thomas Friedman wrote in a recent New York Times article, “Third Party Rising“, that he is “astounded” by the level of disgust with Washington D.C. and the two party system he has found among industry leaders in Silicon Valley and elsewhere. He says he knows of “at least two serious groups” on the East and West coasts “’developing third parties’ to challenge our stagnating two-party duopoly that has been presiding over our nation’s steady incremental decline.”

He predicts that “barring a transformation of the Democratic and Republican Parties, there is going to be a serious third party candidate in 2012, with a serious political movement behind him or her one definitely big enough to impact the election’s outcome”.

Friedman cites the harsh indictment of the two major parties by Stanford political scientist Larry Diamond: “We basically have two bankrupt parties bankrupting the country”. Diamond published similar views back in 2008 in a Huffington Post article, Can American Democracy Recover? He cited “a broad and deepening sense among Americans not only that the country is moving in the wrong direction, but that there is something seriously wrong and corrupt with our democracy”. He provides the following specifics:

MUST READ EVERY WORD….

Phi Beta Iota: We learned this when we went across America for the American Committee on Foreign Relations (ACFR) in the years following 9/11 delivering our lecture, “9/11, U.S. Intelligence, and the Real World.”  Americans are not stupid–mainstream media personalities like Friedman are not stupid either, just oblivious.  They live in their own world with the Kissingers and CNN faces so bent on being polite they cannot muster a tough question or get a grip on the whole.  As we said years ago, Washington may not be interested in reality but reality is assuredly interested in Washington.  It's game time.

See Also:

Votetocracy (vote on bills)

Reference: Diversity of Voices & Values

Reference: Citizenship Versus Transpartisanship

Reference: Cyber-Intelligence–Restore the Republic Of, By, and For…

Harnessing Collective Intelligence to Save Democracy

Tom Atlee Proposes distributed-intelligence, crowd-sourcing participatory think tank for popular common-sense policies, unhindered by party affiliations and ideology

Safety copy below the line.

Continue reading “Reference: Best Piece on Democracy in a Decade”

noble gold