Review (Guest): The Burglary – The Discovery of J. Edgar Hoover’s Secret FBI

5 Star, Corruption, Culture, Research, Executive (Partisan Failure, Reform), Impeachment & Treason, Intelligence (Government/Secret), Justice (Failure, Reform), Power (Pathologies & Utilization), Secrecy & Politics of Secrecy, Voices Lost (Indigenous, Gender, Poor, Marginalized)
0Shares
Amazon Page
Amazon Page

Betty Medsger

5.0 out of 5 stars Hoover's FBI and its threat to the Preservation of our Democratic Values and Institutions, February 8, 2014

Herbert L. Calhoun

Seen properly in its widest context, this book tells us an important story about ourselves. It is a story about a familiar political game that our leaders continue to play on us. First they tell us what to be afraid of, and then they ask us to trust them to know how to protect us? For us to ask questions, to seek open debate, or to make enquiries about any of this is considered disloyal and unpatriotic?

The story in this book is about how one much-revered individual acquired, and then grossly misused the power and trust “we the people” vested in him; and how he was subtly given permission to serve as a proxy for the nation's darkest inner fears. Thus, it is only in this sense that Betty Medsger's book, “The Burglary,” is a story about the FBI — as it is seen indirectly from the vantage point of being the failed institutional reflection of its creator and “leader for life,” J. Edgar Hoover (JEH).

This book thus tells the story of what happens when one of our most revered heroes is allowed to lock himself behind a wall of secrecy, where he and the institution he leads is accountable to no one. And where the willfully created but bogus legends about him are allowed to grow to mythical proportions — until, that is, the truth begins to unravel them. This narrative shows us what happens when that process, and the game of fear upon which it depends, gets played out as trust in our hero begins to wan, and as his image becomes darker and more tarnished as he flails, misfires, turns against us; and finally explodes and disintegrates like a Roman candle on the Fourth of July.

The national hero in question of course is none other than the afore mentioned John Edgar Hoover, who's legend, up until the burglary at the FBI office in Media, Pennsylvania, was as pristine as Caesar's wife's bedroom linen. JEH's FBI shield, literally was the nation's collective shield against all of America's worst fears: the Communists spies, the terrorists, the anti-Vietnam war peace activists, religious pacifists, left-leaning liberals generally, but most of all it was a collective shield against the one symbol that condensed all of these fears into one: America's black population. Mr. Hoover's hatred for blacks was visceral and so virulent that by the time of the burglary, it is not an exaggeration to say that it had “gone critical.”

Continue reading “Review (Guest): The Burglary – The Discovery of J. Edgar Hoover's Secret FBI”

Worth a Look: Michio Kaju on The Future of the Mind

5 Star, Consciousness & Social IQ, Intelligence (Public), Worth A Look
0Shares
Amazon Page
Amazon Page

The New York Times best-selling author of Physics of the Impossible, Physics of the FutureĀ and Hyperspace tackles the most fascinating and complexĀ objectĀ in theĀ known universe:Ā the human brain.

For the first time in history, the secrets of the living brain are being revealed by aĀ battery ofĀ high tech brain scans devised by physicists. Now what was once solely the province of science fiction has become a startling reality. Recording memories, telepathy, videotaping our dreams, mind control, avatars, and telekinesis are not only possible; they already exist.
Ā 
The Future of the Mind gives us an authoritative and compelling look at the astonishingĀ research being done inĀ top laboratories around the world—all based on the latest advancements in neuroscience and physics. Ā One day we might have a “smart pill” that canĀ enhance our cognition; be able to upload our brain to a computer, neuron for neuron; send thoughts and emotionsĀ around the world on a “brain-net”; control computers and robots with our mind; push the very limits of immortality; and perhapsĀ even send our consciousness across the universe.

Dr. Kaku takes us on a grand tour of what the future might hold, giving us not only a solid sense of how the brain functions but also how these technologies will change our daily lives. He even presents a radically new way to think about “consciousness” and applies it to provideĀ fresh insight intoĀ mental illness, artificial intelligence and alien consciousness.

WithĀ Dr. Kaku'sĀ deep understanding of modern science and keen eye for future developments, The Future of the Mind is a scientific tour de force–an extraordinary, mind-boggling exploration of the frontiers of neuroscience.

Worth a Look: The Blue Economy by Gunter Pauli

5 Star, Complexity & Resilience, Decision-Making & Decision-Support, Environment (Solutions), Intelligence (Public), Worth A Look
0Shares
Amazon Page
Amazon Page

The Blue Economy

by GUNTER PAULI author of the Report to the Club of Rome

Blue Economy isĀ  ZERI’s philosophy in action.

Blue Economy is where the best for health and the environment is cheapest and the necessities for life are free thanks to a local system of production and consumption that works with what you have.

“Innovative business models are capable of bringing competitive products and services to the market responding to basic needs while building social capital and enhance mindful living in harmony with nature's evolutionary path.

“Competitivenessā€is harnessing and optimizing the innate virtues and values connecting untapped local potential – like a natural system, where the seeds lie fallow only to sprout with amazing vigor at the first rain unleashing joy and happiness as the conditions for mind full-living are met in balance and in harmony.

BLUE ECONOMY PRINCIPLES

Continue reading “Worth a Look: The Blue Economy by Gunter Pauli”

Anthony Judge: Metascience Enabling Upgrades to the Scientific Process

Academia, Commerce, Cultural Intelligence, Government
29Shares
Anthony Judge
Anthony Judge

Metascience Enabling Upgrades to the Scientific Process

Beyond Science 2.0 in the light of polyhedral metaphors?

Introduction
Enhanced simulation of scientific processes
Topography of the challenges of humanity
Reconsidering the imaginary unit (i) — the “fudge factor” of science
Symbolic implications: ICSU as a case study
Psychosocial coherence as a resonance hybrid?
Global conversation and the nature of any emergent consensus
Emergence of global coherence through Science 2.0?
References

David Swanson: War Can Be Ended — And No, the US Civil War Was Not About Slavery and Not Worth the Human and Other Enduring True Costs

Cultural Intelligence, Peace Intelligence
0Shares
David Swanson
David Swanson

War Can Be Ended

Part I Of BOOK: War No More: The Case For Abolition

Slavery Was Abolished

In the late eighteenth century the majority of people alive on earth were held in slavery or serfdom (three-quarters of the earth’s population, in fact, according to the Encyclopedia of Human Rights from Oxford University Press). The idea of abolishing something so pervasive and long-lasting as slavery was widely considered ridiculous. Slavery had always been with us and always would be. One couldn’t wish it away with naive sentiments or ignore the mandates of our human nature, unpleasant though they might be. Religion and science and history and economics all purported to prove slavery’s permanence, acceptability, and even desirability. Slavery’s existence in the Christian Bible justified it in the eyes of many. In Ephesians 6:5 St. Paul instructed slaves to obey their earthly masters as they obeyed Christ.

Slavery’s prevalence also allowed the argument that if one country didn’t do it another country would: ā€œSome gentlemen may, indeed, object to the slave trade as inhuman and evil,ā€ said a member of the British Parliament on May 23, 1777, ā€œbut let us consider that, if our colonies are to be cultivated, which can only be done by African negroes, it is surely better to supply ourselves with those labourers in British ships, than buy them from French, Dutch or Danish traders.ā€ On April 18, 1791, Banastre Tarleton declared in Parliament—and, no doubt, some even believed him—that ā€œthe Africans themselves have no objection to the trade.ā€

By the end of the nineteenth century, slavery was outlawed nearly everywhere and rapidly on the decline. In part, this was because a handful of activists in England in the 1780s began a movement advocating for abolition, a story well told in Adam Hochschild’s Bury the Chains: Prophets and Rebels in the Fight to Free an Empire's Slaves. This was a movement that made ending the slave trade and slavery a moral cause, a cause to be sacrificed for on behalf of distant, unknown people very different from oneself. It was a movement of public pressure. It did not use violence and it did not use voting. Most people had no right to vote. Instead it used so-called naive sentiments and the active ignoring of the supposed mandates of our supposed human nature. It changed the culture, which is, of course, what regularly inflates and tries to preserve itself by calling itself ā€œhuman nature.ā€

Continue reading “David Swanson: War Can Be Ended — And No, the US Civil War Was Not About Slavery and Not Worth the Human and Other Enduring True Costs”