BrowGate: Ron Paul’s Eyebrows Hold – Comments

Offbeat Fun
0Shares
BrowGate

BrowGate Update:  Ron Paul's eyebrows stayed put tonight, but the comments across the country have expanded to include his senatorial son's toupee from hell, and are posted here to satisfy all those searching for Ron Paul's eyebrows (pun).  And then no more — BrowGate is over.

Campaign Comment for the Record:

Jesse Benton, a campaign spokesman, insisted that Mr. Paul had been the victim of the elements, namely a heavy pollen season in New Hampshire, and called accusations that he’d been artificially enhancing “stupid” and “insulting.”

“Dr. Paul’s allergies acted up a touch,” Mr. Benton said in an explanation that might raise some, you know, questions.

Not that Mr. Paul would be blamed for trying to keep up with bushy brows like Rick Perry’s, whose upper-eye area is full, or Mitt Romney, whose orbital outliers are sometimes speckled with gray.

National Comments (Selected):

Allergies? What? That doesn't even make sense. I have allergies, they make me cough and sniffle. They don't make my eyebrows fall off.

– – – –

Uhm, his allergies acted up so his eyebrows fell off? Is that what the spokesman is implying? And isn't spring allergy season?

You know, if you don't have anything remotely intelligent to say, just say you don't have a clue.

Now I can't wait for Michelle Bachmann's head to fall off and have some alien looking creature crawl out of her.

– – – –

You think you know someone, and then something like this happens!

– – – –

DefDog: Goldman Sachs Executives Stay Fat and Happy

03 Economy, 07 Other Atrocities, 11 Society, Commerce, Corruption, Money, Banks & Concentrated Wealth
0Shares
DefDog

For those who are looking for a reason for the OWS movement…… and the lacking of ability on those who think it is a counter to the Tea Party……

Goldman Execs Stay Fat and Happy

The investment bank had a lousy third quarter, but employees will still take home billions in bonuses. Gary Rivlin asks, what gives?

Read full article.

 

 

Chuck Spinney: Why AF & IQ Have Broken US Military

03 Economy, 10 Security, 11 Society, Corruption, DoD, Government, Military, Officers Call
0Shares
Chuck Spinney

Want to understand why the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have broken the bank?

Then I suggest you carefully read the attached report in the current issue of Harpers, written by my very good friend Andrew Cockburn.  The subject of this brilliant and very important report is the Pentagon's battle against land mines in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Land mines are one of the oldest and most effective forms of warfare [see my essay, Why Mines Warfare is Good for Protracted War, in Counterpunch, 12 January 2011].  They are weapons of choice for the weak, guerrillas in particular, something we certainly should have learned from Vietnam.

Nevertheless, the high tech Pentagon was caught flatfooted by land mines and booby traps in Afghanistan in Iraq.  The surprise was so complete that “planners” found it necessary to spend $60 billion since 2001 to counter what they euphemistically call Improvised Explosive Devices, as if booby traps constructed by guerrillas were a new and unexpected thing.  Notwithstanding this huge expenditure on technology, a cornucopia for defense contractors much greater in fact than the Manhattan Project, even if one removes the effects of inflation, Cockburn lays out a splendid micro history of what really worked — guts, brains, and most importantly, what the Germans used to call fingerspitzengefühl*; and what has not worked — high-cost, high-tech boondoggles produced by contractors, employing gobs of retired military to help them cash in on the golden cornucopia unleashed by the dogs of war.

Continue reading “Chuck Spinney: Why AF & IQ Have Broken US Military”

Winslow Wheeler: Media Plays Dead for Panetta Virus

03 Economy, 04 Inter-State Conflict, 07 Other Atrocities, 10 Security, 11 Society, Budgets & Funding, Commerce, Corporations, Corruption, DoD, Government, IO Deeds of War, Military, Misinformation & Propaganda, Money, Banks & Concentrated Wealth, Power Behind-the-Scenes/Special Interests
0Shares
Winslow Wheeler

Yesterday, the Nieman Watchdog journalism group at Harvard asked me to evaluate how well the press is scrutinizing Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta. Basically, it's not; instead, Panetta seems to be free of informed, skeptical questioning; he must be absolutely delighted with the treatment he is receiving.

Why is the press ignoring Panetta's frenzied rhetoric and data-free myths?

The defense secretary likens budget-cutters to Nazis and makes assertions that simply aren't true — but the media don't seem to care, writes Winslow Wheeler.

The silence in the press about the overheated rhetoric and dubious myths from Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta makes for a very unhappy comparison of today’s defense journalism compared to previous eras when, for example, SecDef Casper Weinberger was the subject of serious critical analysis.

Read full article.

Phi Beta Iota:  Leon Panetta, like Bob Gates before him, is a posturing pimp for the military-industrial complex that pays 5% bribes to get 95% discounts on the taxpayers treasure.  He could not stand up to fifteen minutes on the same stage with any one of us–Chuck Spinney, Winslow Wheeler, Ralph Peters, Bob Scales, etcetera.

Event: 5 Nov: Bank Transfer Day

Money, Banks & Concentrated Wealth
0Shares

Just do it.

5 Nov: Bank Transfer Day

Together we can ensure that corrupt crony-capitalist banking institutions will ALWAYS remember the 5th of November! If the 99% removes our funds from major banking institutions to non-profit credit unions on or by this date, we will send a clear message to the 1% that conscious consumers won’t support companies with unethical business practices.

See Also:

Big Bank Revolt in Full Swing (Videos)

Robert Steele: US Secret Intelligence Next Steps

Advanced Cyber/IO, Cultural Intelligence, Director of National Intelligence et al (IC), Ethics, Government
0Shares
Robert David STEELE Vivas

Responding to a media request for comment on Stephen Aftergood's post, Intelligence Community Anticipates Budget Cuts:

“The US secret intelligence community is long overdue for a draconian reduction of its budget from the $80-90 billion a year today that it wastes on contractors producing vaporware, to something closer to the $20 billion a year that Jim Woolsey is on record as saying would be sufficient, and for once I agree with him.”

“General Tony Zinni is on record as saying that when he was in charge of the US Central Command, the secret intelligence community provided, ‘at best' 4% of what he needed to know.  The fact is that the secret world is primarily a means of transferring wealth from taxpayers to corporations and banks–it not only lacks intelligence, it lacks integrity.”

“Two books sum up the sorry state of the secret world today–No More Secrets: Open Source Information and the Reshaping of U.S. Intelligence, and Top Secret America: The Rise of the New American Security State.

Continue reading “Robert Steele: US Secret Intelligence Next Steps”

Review (Guest): The Conquest of Violence – The Gandhian Philosophy of Conflict

5 Star, Asymmetric, Cyber, Hacking, Odd War, Best Practices in Management, Civil Society, Complexity & Resilience, Consciousness & Social IQ, Democracy, Economics, Education (General), History, Insurgency & Revolution, Intelligence (Public), Nature, Diet, Memetics, Design, Peace, Poverty, & Middle Class, Politics, Public Administration, Religion & Politics of Religion, Strategy, Survival & Sustainment, Values, Ethics, Sustainable Evolution, Voices Lost (Indigenous, Gender, Poor, Marginalized)
0Shares
Amazon Page

Joan Valerie Bondurant

5.0 out of 5 stars Every One on Earth Should Read This Book!,August 12, 2009

This could quite well be the best book ever written about Gandhi's philosophy of conflict: satyagraha. Bondruant's book is systematic and thorough. She lived in India for years and even got a chance to interview Nehru and many of Gandhi's other colleagues about the nonviolent action they were mutually involved with, which eventually brought about Indian Independence. This book was first written either in 1953 or 1958. But this edition was revised in 1988 and includes new, important commentary and afterthought by the author.

The book is everything the other reviewer said, and more. Because the author takes such a systematic approach, I can't imagine a better introduction to Gandhi's philosophy of conflict. But the truly unique and most vitally important aspect of this book, in my opinion, is due to the author's orientation. Her field is political science. She was a researcher who held a high position at the University of California at Berkeley. And she claims that Gandhi's philosophy made a contribution to political science that no system of political theory has ever adequately dealt with before. In that sense, she says, that Gandhi's greatest contribution to the world may have been overlooked. And this, I think, is what makes this book one of the most important books of the 20th century.
Continue reading “Review (Guest): The Conquest of Violence – The Gandhian Philosophy of Conflict”